Energy pro environment
Written by OTiTO
Energy pro environment
The qualitative aspect of power for locomotion could have possibly solved for 80 years, because since the dawn of automotive history there were already vehicles equipped with electric motors.
The electric motor opens a way for a better solution, but shows for itself still no all-inclusive solution for the problem. If one already had in the past powerful enough batteries, then the whole drive development would have possibly turned out in favor of the electric motor. If this had led to a comparably strong boom of the automobile production, as it happened with the combustion engine cars, screams were followed to solve this too strongly increasing demand for electricity. The development of nuclear power would have been promoted faster and we had many times the number of today's nuclear power plants in use all over the world. On the other hand, it is also conceivable that parallel to the usual pressurized (PWR) and boiling water reactors (BWR) of our time, the further development of the liquid salt reactor (MSR - molten salt reactor) would have been accelerated. This would give us in terms of operational reliability and reduced nuclear waste (using thorium as nuclear material) today distinct advantages.
The ultimate head for our today's AC mains is a man of Serbian descent named Nikola Tesla. At the world's fair in 1893 in Chicago Tesla's AC system proved that it could be used on a large scale and had much less power losses then DC, as AC could easily be transformed. Tesla was also the co-inventor of the present three-phase alternating current and experimented already in 1880 with prototypes of electric motors. From a written record of the first director of the "German Inventor House" Heinrich Jebens, as well as reports of Petar Savo, a relative of the Tesla family, pointing out that Nikola Tesla in 1930 by Studbaker Company the luxury model of a "Pierce Arrow 8" with one Equip electric motor.
Thus it would not surprise if the story of the German inventor Klaus Jebens about his father Heinrich Jebens, who had met Tesla in a New York hotel, is true. On November 26, 1930, following a meeting at the Waldorf Astoria, the first director of the 'German inventor house' Heinrich Jebens was invited by Nikola Tesla to a drive from Buffalo to the Niagara Falls. When Tesla and Jebens arrived the next day in a Hall on the outskirts of Buffalo a car stood there - a converted Pierce Arrow with an electric motor. A mechanic installed a converter brought by Tesla. When this was finished, Tesla placed 2 sticks into the converter and said: „ So now we have the energy“. They then drove to the power plant at Niagara Falls that Tesla had designed and thereby achieved a top speed of up to 85 miles/hour. Tesla mentioned to Jebens that the residual energy from the converter will be enough yet to power a single family home.
Tesla demonstrated 86 years ago to this German inventor consultant a prototype of a vehicle powered by space power, which would have been a solution for entry into the production of electric driven cars, without being dependent on external sources of energy, such as nuclear power. So what source does this alternative method of generating electricity tap into?
Regardless of whether this event has actually occurred in this way or not, the concept of a fine imperceptible energy filling all space is ancient. So should it be possible to use these fine not directly perceptible energy?
In the over 5000 year old Indian writings, the Vedas, this energy is called Akasha. Later, with the ancient Greeks, we find the name ether or fifth element (fifth existence) for the lively fine primordial matter, the soul of the world. In 1690 the ether is defined by Christiaan Huygens as a carrier medium of the light which penetrates the steady matter just as the empty space of the universe. Tesla called this energy 'radiations'. Nuclear physics pioneered and brought the notion of tachyons into play. Because this energy exist even where a nothingness is suspected, it is also called vacuum energy. Because this energy nearly penetrates everything that exists it may also be called space energy, because the whole space with all its densities is filled in with it. Since it can be found even where no warmth exists, at the absolute zero point, it is also known as zero-point energy. Today astronomers call them dark energy and quantify their share of the universe to a whopping 73%. The term free energy indicates that it exists independently, not due to a different energy.
If you look at this energy as an independent factor that produces all other physical energy phenomena, then you could also call it Unconditional Energy.
There are so many names for it that you can get already a comprehensive descriptive definition based on the derivation of various names. But all these descriptions have not led to the fact that we use this energy today in the big way. What's still missing is a tangible action definition that describes the cause, potential change, effect and purpose. Such a definition for this energy could provide the key to utilize it directly.
If we want to look at the aspects of cause and purpose, then we have in the physical universe, a similar paradox as in the spiritual universe. In the spiritual universe there is the spirit, - a Static (no mass, no wavelength or energy, no room and not subjected to time) that can cause everything, but its Self is not perceived. It is what you ARE. This spirit (every single one of us) is able to produce a life organism, creating it and reviving it, but Itself can not be perceived. Therefore, in the course of time, these Spirits are likely to get forgotten even and only the organisms that they are reviving is real for them and what we get is - "We are all only bodies that only live once."
The counterpart to the spirit in the spiritual universe is this Unconditional Energy in the physical Universe. Since this Unconditional Energy is only an old commonly created postulate with the purpose of compressing creations - more precisely, this energy follows the purpose: "to compact the garbage of old creations, in an effort to eliminate them" (so the originator of this idea) - we can not perceive this energy itself, because it is only a collaborative postulate that we all have made in accordance with this purpose or that we have agreed to. If we can not perceive this energy itself, what tendancy are we likely to have? Forgetting it´s existence and forgeting that we were involved in it´s creation. So what do we get today because of this maternity - "We have to move to survive, but we are lacking the energy for it".
These two resulting considerations are the perfect self-imposed prison conditions. So that would first be the philosophical background to unconditional energy, if you do not want to make things more complicated than necessary. The fact that we cannot perceive (german “wahr”-nehmen = figurative: to take as “true”) this energy directly, doesn´t make it less existend (true).
Every day, we perceive the effects of it - such as gravity, the firm mass of this planet, our bodies, lightning and all the other energy phenomena - but the cause of it remained hidden to us, until Nikola Tesla began to play around with the effects of this old postulate, in the first half of the last century.
For me, however, it seems strange that it took more than 90 years until finally a publication in a MIT Technology Review from 08.11/2021 revealed the folowing:
“A new fifth force would be a sensation in physics after the discovery of the Higgs particle. Because that would be the best description of the microcosm - the standard model - in its current formulation. First hints towards it in spring already led to a great excitement within the shoal of particle physicists. Now supports another study of the large group of researchers of the LHCB experiment at the 27-kilometer "Large Hadron Collider" (LHC particle accelerator) at CERN at Geneva this view of new physics.
In principle, an extended new version of the standard model itself would be a sensation. But a better understanding of the microcosm, perhaps with a fifth force, could also lead to clarifying the still open puzzles around the dark matter, microscopic black holes or so far not discovered, hidden dimensions over the three space and the time dimension.”
However, it is surprising that it needed 90 years, an army of particle physicists, and a 27-kilometer "Large Hadron Collider" (particle accelerator) to solve this "puzzle" about the dark matter/energy, by an understanding of the fifth force. Maybe you can understand why this temporal, personnel and tremendous material effort to arrive at the cognition that this fifth fource actually exists, puzzles me, when you reach the end of this article.
Let us so try to undertake a few small steps in this direction, while we get the above descriptive terms as a starting point for further hypothetical analysis and set the following:
-
Our whole universe, the earth, moon, planets, sun, stars, the Milky Way and other galaxies, as well as the whole spaces in between, with its temperatures from absolute 0 point to the hottest places, is imbued with an energy which exists independent of other masses and energies, but interacts with it.
-
Considering its substance or its properties, this energy has a wavelength somewhere between 0 and infinitesimal wavelength, otherwise it wouldn’t be in accordance with the descriptive definition, able to penetrate anything, unless it is oscillating particles or purely vibrational motions. It´s reaction time is almost immediately. (speed > C)
-
Another basic feature of this energy is it´s inherent strive to always exist in a state of balanced density. Where disturbances of these conditions occur potentials get created, in an effort to bring about a compensation of these altered conditions.
-
In the following text, I use the term Unconditional Energy. The abbreviation for Unconditional Energy will be UE and UEP for the free energy potential.
-
More basic than the Unconditional Energy is the space of our universe. In our solar system exists much more space without matter as space consumed by matter. This relationship is even more extreme in favor of 'free' space within our Galaxy, and in the sphere of the universe, we find almost endless space between the galaxies. In microcosm, at the level of atoms, it is no different. In the atoms we find the void with a tiny core and a few movements of electrons around the nucleus, if this model corresponds to the facts. But regardless, you can say that the 'free' space has the absolute lion's share in the atom. By 'Free space' is meant the space not claimed by matter or any different energy than ‘the Unconditional Energy’. The most extreme idea which has come to my ears in this regard indicates that we could accommodate the actual mass of the universe on a pinhead. But we must not claim such extremes, to understand the further expositions.
-
Where the Unconditional Energy meets only the 'free' space there is initially no interaction. The potential difference of the UEP is in the “free” space, where it is only with itself and “free” space, coinciding with no other movement than its own, is completely neutral and appears outwardly as UEP=0. Within these areas it is at least locally, a homogeneous field, but it is conceivable that there are areas with different densities also inside the whole 'free space'. Thus the UE field within a solar system could be more dense, than its field between the stars. The UE fields between the galaxies possibly has the lowest density. Nevertheless, in all these areas UEP=0 may be the case.
-
Where the Unconditional Energy coincides with spaces, which are filled with matter and energy, it comes to various interactions - and perhaps even to the very many phenomenon, which are already explored by our physics. Looking from the perspective of the UE, the Earth is a very porous structure, which the UE can "see through" and so many particles or vibrations can make their way through it. Others, however, do not provide this path and collide with the nuclei and some get involved in motions within our atoms creating "electrons" bound on the nuclei. In case the UEP encounters any almost impenetrably density, as for example that of a big black hole, the potential of the UEP gets almost up to its greatest possible potential. All intermediate potentials could be described with values between 0 and 100%. Some properties that are emerging from these apparent interactions are:
-
The homogeneity of the free energy, as it is the case in the free space will be disturbed and potentials occur. Areas in which the free energy has different densities, UEP=0, is no longer given. (Exception: at the center of celestial bodies)
-
The earth gets the quality of the "gravitation" and everything on it receives weight.
-
The weight depends on the density of the object, the extent of their space holes, thus the force acting on it gets defined.
-
The fact that any object on earth is falling with the same acceleration to the ground (apart from air resistance) is due to the fact that the magnitude of the force is determined by the density of the mass. The lower the density the more UE can freely slip through the object = less force impact. Objects of higher density cause more collisions = more forces can act. The property of the object determines virtually the amount of force vectors of UE Potential given to the mass. The same acceleration of an object in free-fall is thus determined by 2 main factors:
-
a) by the size of the potential within the UEP, due to the specific mass of the earth.
-
b) from the amount of force vectors of this potential, which can push against the object where it consists not only of space.
The following simple two-dimensional representations are due to my graphical shortcomings in the field of computer animation, because there are only two dimensions and thus only four directions.
The black framed box symbolizes a space capsule, the manlike symbol an astronauts and the red line a laser beam. Astronaut and laser beam should illustrate what happens to you under the given circumstances.
All examples described below are known, observable phenomena of physics, solely the stated explanations and effects result in a new image of the actual contexts.
Let us consider different phenomena in space and how the Unconditional Energy is related to this:
An astronaut is in space without gravitational influence
The potential difference of the Unconditional Energy is approximately 0
Picture 1
UEP above = 0
UEP left = 0 UEP right = 0
UEP below = 0
Explanation: The capsule and body appear weightless and the laser is not deflected because they are in a homogeneous field of the Unconditional Energy. Therefore, no gravitational effect takes place. But all material manifestations remain because they continue to be in interaction with the Unconditional Energy.
An astronaut is in space without gravitational influence
but in a capsule with acceleration.
Picture 2
UEP above ≠ 0,
UE Wind, through acceleration causes a tiny UE pile-up
UEP left = 0 ↑↑ UEP Right =0
UEP below ≠ / = 0
acceleration thrust from below causes
a tiny reduction of UE density occurs
(Rule 3 above explains why this happens)
Explanation: The astronaut is subjected to a force that pushes him down and the laser is bent down. The acceleration creates an 'UE Wind', one might say, which pushes the body and laser beam down during acceleration, because of it´s strive to balance out the altered density condition (compare Nr. 3 above) As soon as the cruising speed is reached, this effect decreases again, because the almost instant reaction time (speed > C) compensates it faster then the capsule is able to move. (Compare Nr. 2 above) As soon as the direction or speed of the capsule is changed by any kind of acceleration, the laser beam will instantly respond to these changes, since we are not moving through empty space, but through an 'ether' that manifests itself, within it´s properties, as a quasi 'resistance to change', but afterwards it can adapt itself to any uniform movement due to the almost timeless reaction time.
An acceleration in a homogeneous UEP generates a counterforce.
This corresponds on the earth to the phenomena of the so-called
“frictious forces” ,“pseudo forces” , “inertial forces” or “apparent forces”
and is the CAUSE of the so called forces".
Picture 3
After reaching cruising speed
UEP above = 0
UEP left = 0 UEP right = 0
UEP blow = 0
due to their extremely fast reaction time (see point speed > C),
and the strive for a state of balanced density,
at constant speed the effect gets counterbalanced
the state of weightlessness returns.
An astronaut is in free fall with his capsule
and the capsule is then decelerated.
For demonstration purposes, the UEP value for Earth was set at an arbitrary value of 10%. That would mean that the earth absorbs 10% of the UE and the remaining 90% passes through the earth unhindered. However, 90% of the energy escapes from the earth again and so there is a potential difference of 10% on the earth's surface to the external, distant, homogeneous UE field. The 10% absorption of the UE by the earth creates a pull within the elastic UE field around the earth and the surrounding field is thinned out. So the long-distance effect of 'gravity' follows the original purpose of this Unconditional Energy to concentrate the garbage of ancient creations and cleanse the immediate surroundings.
The capsule in free-fall towards Earth
lets the astronaut experience the following scenario
Picture 4
UEP above ≠ 0
the 0 to -10% increasing potential is converted into motion
↓↓
↓↓
UEP left = 0 Motion towards earth UEP right = 0
UEP below ≠ 0 ( -10%)
_____________Earth surface_____________
Explanation: This scenario is a bit more difficult to understand, since the earth's mass must be considered. Suppose the Earth would absorb (convert) 10% of UE, acting on it from all sides, then the outlet of UE from the mass of the earth around the globe would 10% lower as the inflowing UE. A gradual potential arises within the Unconditional Energy Field, in and around the Earth, with the potential difference disappearing in the center of earth again, but at a 10% lower energy density level in relation to the homogeneous UE field sourrounding earth .
Therefore, objects in a free fall move toward Earth's center. But at the center of the earth would prevail weightlessness because all UE vectors arriving from all sides, would amount to the same reduced density, and so we get in the center of the earth UEP = 0, but on a 10% lower level, as it is the case in free space.
Back to our example of "weightlessness" in the free fall. Of this -10% UE potential, which acts around the earth, now presses a degree of force vectors determined by the gradual potential difference on our object in free fall on the areas of the object that cannot be penetrated (Atomcores). This accelerates the object.
The gradually, up to -10% of the UE potential, incident forces accelerate the object evenly with the gravitational acceleration of 1G. In free fall, the existing UEP is converted into kinetic energy. The UE force vectors of this potential press against and accelerate the capsule, but the capsule moves with these vectors, whereby “weightlessness” gets simulated, but only until the capsule is slowed down by other factors.
Each UE potential is converted into kinetic energy
if it can act on a freely moving body.
The difference between free fall and weightlessness in space is that in free fall, the gradual increasing potential difference of the Unconditional Energy Field around earth is converted into kinetic energy, simulating “weightlessness” for the object. In actual weightlessness, the acceleration caused by the propulsion thrust on the capsule produces a change in state of balanced density in the surrounding UE-field, a potential gets created and it´s instant backslash produces the phenomenon of short time gravity.
So within an UEP you can simulate
weightlessness by acceleration.
Within a homogeneous UE field
gravity can be generate by acceleration.
Here's what happens when the capsule in a free fall
is slowed down and lands
Picture 5
UEP above ≠ 0
The gradually increasing UEP from 0 to -10%
is converted into motion and
↓↓
UEP left = 0 UEP right = 0
UEP below ≠ 0
simulats weightlessness
Picture 6
gradual return (missing images)
UEP above ≠ 0
↓↓
UEP left = 0 ↑↑ UEP right = 0
Counter-thrust creates relative weight
UEP ≠ 0
Picture 7
full earth UEP = -10%
↓↓
UEP left = 0 UEP right = 0
UEP = -10%
_____________Earth surface_____________
As the capsule decelerates and eventually comes to an halt, the gradually decreasing density of the UE returns to the UEP -10% potential of the Earth's surface and the body gradually regains its Earth weight.
Although similar phenomena occur, the difference between Figure 7 and Figure 2 is that there is a permanent force pushing the body, the laser light, and the capsule down toward the Earth's center area, and no artificial acceleration is needed to create this condition.
The state UEP=0 applies in such a gradual UE field (gravitational field of the earth) from the center of the earth only on the horizontally ascending spherical surfaces in contrary to free space, in which it applies everywhere. You have to imagine the whole thing as a three-dimensional field that penetrates the entire globe, with the lowest density of the earthly UE field prevailing in a variable area (depending on the absorptivity of the layers above) of the center (greatest absorption of the UE). From there, these differences decrease and gradually extend far into space until they finally return to UEP=0. This is how the long-distance effect of gravity could be explained, by the UE`s inherent strive to always exist in a state of balanced density.
In contrast to the energies that we explore under purely earthly conditions, this energy itself is not subject to a + / - duality. This requires a rethinking of the physicists, to think more in the direction of densities, allowing a potential to develop within them. The field of the UE appears to have static and at the same time elastic properties and where its homogeneity is disturbed, these elastic properties come into play. The properties of this EU field would have to be explored in detail. So far there are no direct methods of measurement that I am aware of. Notes related to the exploration of this energy can be communicated in this Telegram group.
The “pseudo and inertial forces” on earth themselves give the strongest reference to the existence of Unconditional Energy. It should be noted that physics in the area of these forces comes into spinning and has denied this 5th force so far, in an attempt to attribute it to the mass itself. When I originally wrote this article in May 2016, my attention got attracted to these illogical deviations of physics in connection with the definitions of centrifugal forces and pseudo forces (Wikipedia). In the meantime, there is no definition in the german Wikipedia anymore for "pseudo force", "mass attraction" although these terms continue to be used and the definitions for centripedal and centrifugal power have been rewritten. Therefore, I give the illogical passages of the old definition of pseudo force here in short again:
“Pseudo forces and inertial forces ... act on the (sluggish) mass of a body and have the dimension of a physical force. ... Pseudo like real forces are perceived by man, as the brain is instinctively attempting in accelerated reference systems (classic example: a rotating carousel) to bring the perceived forces in line with the (intuitively detected) laws in an inertial system. Although actually in the carousel only a force acting in the direction of the center occurs (the centripedal force), one experiences the situation as if there was an externally directed power (the pseudo force as centrifugal force), which can only be compensated by it by pulling your weight towards the center. This faltracization arises because the (only deformation-sensitive) sensory cells do not provide information about the actual orientation of the force (outwards or inside), but it is unconsciously closed from the brain in which direction we would seem to move under the influence of this force (towards Outside). That this intuitive interpretation is wrong, you can see that the perceived force as soon as you jump from the carousel, is stopped immediately and you are not moved radially outward (as the brain intuitively suspects), but tangentially in straightforward track - and that even because of the pulse ("momentum"), which one had at the moment of loosening, and not because of the effect of a force. The experianced force was actually only the (inwardly directed) force, which has held one on the carousel.
An important role for the interpretation of the brain plays optical information, ie its own movement relative to the immediate environment. Therefore, one has e.g. in the case of water skiing, the impression of being pulled forward when starting from the motorboat forward, while in the subway in exactly the same situation is more likely to be pulled back (pressed).
These psychological aspects often confuse in the attempt to understand pseudo forces."
So on the carousel there is only a force directed towards the center, but you fly tangentially outwards when you jump off. According to my observations, the people on the spinning devil's wheel (at the folk festival/fair) always flew outwards, especially when it was accelerated. But I've never seen one fly inward. Nothing more needs to be said, I'll leave the rest to your own observation. If you can't observe, then you're left with complicated opinions to understand something. That would be my 'psychological' evaluation of the above definition of 'pseudo forces'
This energy has been given new names by various people for 5000 years, although man believed that it cannot be perceived and that it is only imagined.
Your body is pressed against the ground by this energy every second of your existence. When you accelerate in your car, that energy pushes you into the seat. You're riding the bus, the bus driver brakes, and the impact of that energy propels you forward. You're accelerating rapidly on a carousel, and that force pushes you outward hard. (The seats move away from the center) The last three examples on Earth are essentially a combination of the two above examples of gravity pushing you down, overlaid by the acceleration against the Unconditional Energy field acting on you in the horizontal plane.
Paradigm change - but what kind?
The next large technological revolution is initiated by the peaceful use of this energy. It could be evolution to the decentralized energy supply that means increased self-sufficient for every human being and each regional group. It is conceivable today by nanotechnology to produce semiconducting film, which generates similar to a solar cell from the light, energy from the energy particles of the Unconditional Energy. Such a surface coating on cars could then charge the batteries or even drive the cars directly. The bricks of our homes could contain such layers and deliver the electricity and heat for our homes. Trains, ships and aircraft could be equipped and operated during day or night, because the converter is not depending on daylight. Particularly interesting for planes could be, that they could lose weight if they convert this energy on a high rate, because less UE force vectors can hit the core of it´s atom masses. It has been already observed that some transducers lost weright with increasing performance.
How could it be possible that this energy remained hidden from us for so long, when Nikola Tesla has been able to power a car with it since 1930 and its existence has been given names by people for 5000 years?
Well, self-sufficiency is such a thing - self-sufficient people are not so easy to exploit and control. It is far better to sell them oil, gas and electricity and get rich from it than to sell them appliances that will make them independent of all other energy sources. But -
“It would be clever to collect these ideas, to take it under closure and secretly explore this technology of energy production. Now is not the right time to give to them, because - humanity is not ready for that. Only when they all have bought and agreed to the idea, that it will make them happy to possess nothing - the time has come - Yes! - Then the right time is to let the bells ring for it and we can tell you that the big breakthrough has succeeded in the CERN. Then we can lent you such a device and if you do not pay your rent or otherwise respond defiantly, then we simply switch off your smart converters! " so Mr. Global
Well, this is one of the possible paths this development could take, should this paradigm shift be realized as a so-called “Great Reset” on behalf of Mister Global, directed by Klaus Schwab. But if things turn out differently and this technology is developed independently, then we have certainly come a step closer to our “original paradisiacal state of man”. We could once again enjoy landscapes without any electricity poles, as well as the pure air and clear water of our earth.
